Titties Bigglesby
You just got bullied by a nerd bitch! A man with a bow-tie just verbally rested his testicles on your chin.
Constantine Lycouris
u can just see how retarded the world is... 2 intelligent people and the one senile guy is the guy with the power.. GREEEAAAAATT
We breath Co2, so it can't be dangerous? We also breath H2O on a regular basis, and the human body is primarily made up of water, so why don't you submerge yourself in water and ponder why the hell you want to get back up.
Hiz hunny
😍😍😍😍😍 bill nyee
Any one that takes the monopolised media outlets seriously and believes they are operating without any influence by invested interests should go see a doctor about getting themselves chemically sterilised.
Paul TheSkeptic
It's stupid that we actually have to debate science. It didn't used to be like this young people. There was a time when people respected the scientific consensus. Now, it doesn't seem to matter what it is. People think that if they don't like it, they get to question it. Not even the fact that the earth is a sphere is proven enough for some.
Apart from the roads, education, clean drinking water, sanitation, security and the wine, What has Science ever done for us?
Bill nye looks like he's about to loose his shit XD
james munroe
bills face for that whole first minute.

That is all.
Crazy Snake
Does this argument boil down to Pascal's Wager with respect to climate change (the major difference being we actually have evidence one way or the other)? Or am I oversimplifying it?
If I bet that rapid climate change is real and I spend money and resources working to that hypothesis I get a result that creates a future we can all work with, whether it's true or not.
If I bet it's an hysterical hoax and it's not, I stand to lose everything.
Doesn't it make logical sense to act as if it's true?
TheBeardedOne X
"Destroys"😂😂😂 Apparently you watched something completely different from this piece!! Nye had absolutely no real argument... Speed and rate, yet no numbers to back his claim. Anytime he is ever asked to back his claims, Nye always gets defensive and let's emotion take over. Nye is NOT credible to even talk about climate!! He needs to stick to his music videos. pfft🙄💩
Will Smithsucks
I don't know but Happer seemed scared af while he spoke, he wasn't confident.
Will Smithsucks
I'm glad to hear president Lincoln speaks on youtube !
Sigh I was proud when I became a citizen of The United States and was optimistic of its people's future. Now, however, I'm pessimistic because we've become a country that's ruled by corruption and money and not driven by democracy, freedom, and technological and scientific progress.
BlacKwoLF CoNsPiracY
Seriously , common people tell me. Who do you think that old white guy who prolly smokes cigars and has a locker in the most expensive golf club, who do you think he's fiends with? Seriously man. These old white rich guys don't care what happens because they have another 10-15 years left. And what makes you think they want to lose their money now? LoL makes me sick
Click bait title, but that old fart deserves a knuckle sandwich. >_>
Jon R
Every single climate change panel or debate should start with the mention the the 50-50 representation is nonsense.
mark haas
CO2 = Plant Food. It is literally the 2nd most important compound to
Life after H2O. Bill isn't a scientist, but even as an engineer he should know that increased
CO2 production will simply be absorbed at a higher rate by increased
plant and phytoplankton biomass. There's a reason that green-house
farmers produce the gas artificially and pump it into their structures. To make their crops grow faster.
Matthew Beltrano
What about the 1/3 of children live in hunger in America, tell them instead a meal we are goiing to give government more money for climate change hysteria. Its bs people, Bill Nye lives in fantasy land where universal problems are universally solved. Wrong. Just more money given to government for no real reason or even stupidly heartfelt.
Josie Lee
CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL BITCHES suck it up and fix it
Johnny D.
Garbage in garbage out as far as computer models go.
Sergio Sánchez
He is out of his mind or senile
Antonio Reid
This is why CNN is fake news. They are a news channel talking about climate change and refuse to bring on a CNN climatologist to discuss climate change. FAKE NEWS
Alarmist Computers.....computers can be so dramatic, huh? Christ these deniers are so full of shit, they just want the EPA gone to make money. Then there is Trump's base, too uneducated and unwilling to be educated to see how much damage they're doing to themselves, and everyone else. Asshats, the whole lot.
HELLS BELLS!!! Bill Nye is about as much a "scientist" as Charles Manson was a guidance counselor for troubled teens!
All Bill Nye has is a rinky-dink bachelors degree in mechanical engineering which doesn't qualify him to be jack shit except an engineer at a construction firm or production plant. Until Bill gets his PhD he is NOT a scientist; he's just some jack-off who thinks he's a "scientist" by way of his ability to act on TV!
Cayden Poe
The only thing Bill Nye destroys is his diaper.
Shahin Shahinpour
Happer is incredibly brain dead. How does this man have any position of powe.. smh us
Cars and trucks run cleaner than ever before but unfortunately they produce the same amount of CO2 as before since the exhaust systems do not convert to another substance. More people get behind the wheel every year and that being said we produce more CO2 every year. Industrial release doesn't increase nearly as fast as the auto emissions release grows. If real change is to be made we need to get CO2 emitting cars and trucks off the roads.
D3 Drone
A.) Bill Nye is an actor
B.) Bill Nye claims there are 80 different genders.

Lol :)
D. Aware
more like nye gets destroyed.. ,, had no evidence to rebuff...
Kameron Briggs
Hes right though, bill nye was slapped like a fuckin idiot in this? .... wtf are you guys smoking?
only thing bill can destroy is shemale cock
plusaf dotcom
Nye's "cherry-picking" complaint doesn't reflect the 'cherry-picking' of his "97% agree." Those 97% were cherry picked out of several hundred "scientists", but when the sample size wasn't cherry-picked, a sample size of several thousand papers and their authors showed that roughly 50%, plus or minus ONE OR TWO PERCENT found that human activities were the cause.
So, if you like real data, make your climate change decisions based on coin flipping... the odds are similar!
plusaf dotcom
Nye's history lessons and forecasts don't contain DATA to back his claims... very weak "argument."
Retooling for renewables? The countries with the most 'renewables' also have the highest costs of electricity. Enjoy!
San Pol
Is it soo difficult to understand that countries that invest money on new technologies will be on the top? Who thinks the fossil fuels are just ok , will pay a high price in the future for ignorance.
Countries that really invest in science will by pass EUA !
Aaron DenHartigh
It's terrifying that people like him run this country
tim Gipson
Jeeeeesus Christ , Victor Blackwell stfu and let Bill finish.
Robert Baratheon
Mind numbing stupidity.
Mario Pardo
Alright guys cyanide is simply made of carbon and nitrogen, we are made of carbon and dying matter expells nitrogen so it's perfectly safe!! This also goes the other way around, water is awesome but separate it and Hydrogen is higly explosive and oxygen fuels fires.
William Happer and President Trump..(President Chump), stuck in the past! Move forward people.
Clint Young
I hate the oil industry.
Ferdinand De Guzman
Potato Priorites
For those of you who don't believe CO2 is dangerous, I invite you to put a plastic bag over your head and tell me how that turns out
Mart Mcfly
Something u should know----------

What is the tribulation? The great tribulation will bring the greatest time of trouble ever to come upon mankind.

What is the rapture? The rapture of the church is the event in which God “snatches away” all believers from the earth in order to make way for His righteous judgment to be poured out on the earth during the tribulation period.

Why did JESUS die on cross? To pay the price for u!

How can I be saved?
Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved!

(True repentance)
Can't people such as the guy on the bottom right simply be shot dead?
Mr. Fett Esq.
Bill Nye doesn't "destroy" anyone HAHAHA. He states his opinion and it's not a factual opinion because it's just his opinion. He trays to pass it off as fact and says he knows for sure. But that just isn't the case. Bill Nye just isn't very reputable. He gets paid by "Global Warming" believers...who then changed it to "climate change" because the earth isn't getting any warmer!! Lol! Nye does a disservice to this topics stance.
Well, i'm definitely not going to Princeton! The fuck did i just watch!?
Steven Zore
The fact is, there is and always has been, and always will be, natural climate change, but the contribution of human activity is necessarily so minuscule as to be nearly undetectable. Here’s why:

Carbon dioxide, considered the main vector for human-caused global warming, is 0.039% of the atmosphere- a trace gas. Water vapor varies, but averages around 1%, and is about ten times more effective a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. So water vapor is about 25 times more prevalent and ten times more effective; that makes it 250 times more important to the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide. The TOTAL contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect is therefore about 0.004%. The total human contribution to carbon dioxide since the start of the industrial revolution has been estimated at about 25%. So human greenhouse effect is a quarter of 0.004%, works out to about 0.001%. Since TOTAL greenhouse effect on temperature is estimated at around 63 degrees Fahrenheit, that would come to human-caused warming of about 0.063 degrees Fahrenheit.

But that’s only the beginning. We’ve had global warming for at least 10,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age. Whatever caused that, it was not human activity. It was not all those power plants and factories and SUVs being operated by Stone Age cavemen while chipping arrowheads out of bits of flint. Whatever the cause was, it caused the glaciers, which once extended south to Long Island and the northern suburbs of New York City, to not only melt back, but completely disappear (except for a few mountain remnants). That’s one big greenhouse effect! If we are still having global warming – and I suppose we should presume we are, given a 10,000 year trend – it is as close to a certainty as one can get that it is still the overwhelmingly primary cause of continued warming, rather than our piddling 0.001% contribution to the greenhouse effect.

The science is now all-but-settled on global warming. Convincing new evidence demonstrates cosmic rays and the sun — not human activities — as the dominant controller of climate on Earth. The research, published with little fanfare in the prestigious journal Nature, comes from über-prestigious CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. They demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that in Earth’s atmosphere can grow and seed clouds, the cloudier and thus cooler it will be. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere (the stronger the sun’s magnetic field, the more it shields Earth from incoming cosmic rays from space), the sun determines the temperature on Earth.

Yet even that trend-continuation still needs to be proved. Evidence is that the Medieval Warm Period in the 1200s was somewhat warmer than we are now, and the climate was a lot colder in the Little Ice Age in the 1600s than it is now. So we are within the range of normal up-and-down fluctuations without human greenhouse contributions that could be significant, or even measurable.

The principal scientists arguing for human-caused global warming have been demonstrably disingenuous, and now you can see why. They have proved they should not be trusted.

For all those using the 98% of scientists agree that man is causing global warming...er...climate change.

Geez you are gullible. It is not 98% of scientists. The 98% comes from a SURVEY (in case you didn't know, a survey is not a scientific study) sent out in 2009 to 10,257 people. 3,146 answered the survey. Of that 3,146 there were 77 climate scientists who answered. Of those, 75 answered yes to the second of two questions asked by the survey. Question #1 was “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” . Question #2 was “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”

Both questions beg the following: What constitutes “significant”? Does “changing” include both cooling and warming… and for both “better” and “worse”? And which contributions…does this include land use changes, such as agriculture and deforestation?"

You and anyone spouting the 98% of scientist as a consensus are gullible and useful idiots to those with an agenda.

You talk about the stupidity on the"deniers" when you yourselves exhibit it far more frequently than any denier. You let yourself be spoon fed by a media that is more interested in telling you what you should believe rather than reporting all the sides of the issue so people can decide for themselves.

Truth hurts but it doesn't change the fact it is the truth.

For an entertaining and devastating critique of the alleged “science” behind the AGW argument, check out this video:


Richard Muller is a physicist at the University of California campus at Berkeley (!). He is a bit of a showman, but he is also a serious scientist.

The idea that we should be spending billions upon billions of dollars to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is beyond ludicrous in light of the facts above; it is insane. The true motivation underlying the global warming movement is almost certainly ideological and political in nature, and I predict AGW, as currently preached, will go down as the greatest fraud of all time. It makes Madoff and Ponzi look like pikers by comparison













If this happened after Harvey and Irma, he would destroy the anti climate changer by saying that the hurricanes wouldn't have done as much damage today compared to 20 years ago
Actually my last comment, whilst true, is not what I really want. I want every climate change denier to live. I want them to, when the end is upon us, to fight and kick and scream and suffer. Whilst those of us who accept the truth choose to go quietly into that good night.
Related Videos
Thumbnail: Bill Nye DESTROYS Climate Change Deniers - "They Suffer Psychological DELUSION & Deny EVIDENCE"
Thumbnail: Climate Change Debate: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Thumbnail: Bill Nye Destroys Noah's Ark
Thumbnail: Bill Nye's Open Letter to President Donald Trump
Thumbnail: Bill Maher destroys Donald Trump again and again
Thumbnail: Climate Change salesman Bill Nye is Destroyed
Thumbnail: Bill Nye Destroys CNN ON CNN for Their Climate Denying Meteorologist
Thumbnail: Tucker vs. Bill Nye the Science Guy
Thumbnail: Bill Nye DESTROYS Trump Adviser William Happer over Climate Change
Thumbnail: Bill Nye On President Donald Trump's Climate Orders: 'Clean Coal Is A Myth' | The Last Word | MSNBC
Thumbnail: "Alternative Facts" with Bill Nye The Science Guy
Thumbnail: Bill Nye destroys Trump and his voter's crazy way of thinking by explaining it
Thumbnail: Bill Nye Talks Donald Trump EPA, Energy Secretary Picks | MSNBC
Thumbnail: Bill Nye takes aim at climate change deniers
Thumbnail: Bill Nye Destroys The Bible's Great Flood Myth
Thumbnail: Bill Nye Destroys Climate Change Conspiracy Theories
Thumbnail: Bill Nye calls out lawmakers
Thumbnail: Bill Nye wants Trump to dream for Mars
Thumbnail: Bill Nye The Science Guy Destroys Trump And Explains Why He Is An Idiot