Padmavati (Interesting facts ) Movie Real Story - Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh, Shahid Kapoor

PadmavatiReal StoryDeepika PadukoneRanveer SinghShahid KapoorSanjay Leela BhansalViacom 18 Motion PicturesPrakash KapadiaAditi Rao HydariBapi-TutulJayant JadharfilmBhansali Productions1 December 2017Budget ₹160 crore[1]moviehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_5_BLt76c0

Padmavati (Interesting facts )Movie Real Story 

पद्मावती
Directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Produced by 
Viacom 18 Motion Pictures
Bhansali Productions
Written by 
Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Prakash Kapadia
Screenplay by Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Starring Deepika Padukone
Shahid Kapoor
Ranveer Singh
Aditi Rao Hydari
Music by Songs:
Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Background Score:
Bapi-Tutul
Cinematography Sudeep Chatterjee
Edited by Jayant Jadhar
Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Akiv Ali
Production
company
Bhansali Productions
Distributed by Viacom 18 Motion Pictures
Release date
1 December 2017
Running time
155 minutes
Country India
Language Hindi
Budget ₹160 crore[1]
Facebook:- https://www.facebook.com/FilmPadmavati
Twitter:- https://twitter.com/FilmPadmavati/
Instagram:- https://www.instagram.com/FilmPadmavati/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_5_BLt76c0

Ramendra Chakarwarti
दर्शकों की तरफ से ट्रेलर को काफी कम समय में अच्छा रिस्पॉन्स मिल रहा है. इस रिस्पॉन्स को देखकर रणवीर सिंह काफी भावुक हैं. इसी के चलते उन्होंने इंस्टाग्राम पर अपने फैन्स और फ्रेंड्स के लिए एक खत शेयर किया है.
Ramendra Chakarwarti
https://www.instagram.com/p/BaCqmewhup_/
Ramendra Chakarwarti
स्‍मृति ईरानी ने कहा, 'मैं इस बात पर यकीन दिलाती हूं कि फिल्म रिलीज के समय कानून व्यवस्था पूरी तरह से नियंत्रण में होगा. साथ ही, राज्य सरकार इस बात का ख्याल रखेगी कि ऐसे कोई भी शरारती तत्व मौजूद न हो जो किसी भी प्रकार के इंटरेक्शन और डिस्प्ले में बाधा डाले.'
Ramendra Chakarwarti
नई दिल्ली [स्पेशल डेस्क]। रानी पद्मावती इतिहास की नायिका हैं या साहित्य की ये हमेशा विवादों में रहा है। कहा जाता है कि 13वीं-14वीं शताब्दी में पद्मावती नाम की कोई नायिका थी ही नहीं। दिल्ली की सल्तनत पर काबिज सुल्तानों की निगाहें हर उन रियासतों पर या राज्यों पर लगी थीं, जो उसके लिए खतरा थीं। चित्तौड़ उनमें से एक था। कहा जाता है कि दिल्ली की गद्दी पर काबिज राजा, सुल्तान या बादशाह सभी राजपुताना को अपने कब्जे में रखने की कोशिश करते थे। दरअसल भारत के इतिहास पर नजर डालें तो केंद्रीय सत्ता को सबसे ज्यादा चुनौती राजपुताना से मिलती रही। लेकिन हम जिस विषय पर बात करने जा रहे हैं वो अलाउद्दीन खिलजी, राजा रतन सिंह और रानी पद्मावती से जुड़ी है। इन किरदारों पर मशहूर फिल्म निर्देशक संजय लीला भंसाली रुपहले पर्दे पर अपने खास अंदाज में रानी पद्मावती को पेश करने जा रहे हैं, जो एक दिसबंर को रिलीज होगी। इस विषय पर विवाद के सुर फिल्म की शूटिंग के दौरान फूट पड़े थे, जब करणी सेना ने राजपूत इतिहास को तोड़मरोड़ कर पेश करने को लेकर जयपुर में फिल्म के सेट पर तोड़फोड़ की थी। लेकिन सबसे पहले ये जानना जरूरी है कि पद्मावती कौन थीं और पूरी कहानी क्या है।

रूपवान रानी पद्मावती की कहानी

रानी पद्मावती को रानी पद्मिनी के नाम से भी जाना जाता है। वह 13-14 शताब्दी की एक महान भारतीय रानी थी। मलिक मुहम्मद जायसी ने महाकाव्य 'पदमावत' में सिंघल साम्राज्य की एक असाधारण सुंदर राजकुमारी का वर्णन किया है। चित्तौड़ के राजा रतन सेन को रानी की सुंदरता के बारे में बोलने वाले एक तोते हीरामन से पता चला था, जिसके बाद उन्होंने पद्मावती से शादी कर ली। वह रतन सिंह की दूसरी पत्नी थीं। कहा जाता है कि वह बचपन में बोलने वाले एक तोते हीरामन की करीबी दोस्त बन गईं। जब पद्मिनी के पिता राजा गंधर्व सेन को बेटी और हीरामन के करीबी रिश्ते का पता चला, तो उन्होंने तोते को जान से मारने का आदेश दिया। हालांकि, हीरामन वहां से उड़ने में कामयाब हो गया और एक बहेलिये ने उसे पकड़कर एक ब्राह्मण को बेच दिया। उसके बाद रतन सेन ने ब्राह्मण से तोता खरीद लिया।

राघव चेतन नाम के शख्स चित्तौड़ के शाही दरबार में बैठते थे और राजा रतन सेन ने धोखाधड़ी करने पर उन्हें निकाल दिया था। बताया जाता है कि राघव चेतन ने रानी पद्मावती के बारे में दिल्ली के सुल्तान अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को बताया था, जिसके बाद खिलजी ने पद्मावती से मिलने का फैसला किया। अलाउद्दीन खिलजी ने रानी पद्मिनी को पाने के लिए रतन सेन का अपहरण कर दिया। जब रतन सेन ने रानी पद्मिनी को देने से इंकार कर दिया, तो खिलजी ने रतन सेन को शांति संधि का धोखा दिया और उसे दिल्ली ले गया। बाद में रानी पद्मिनी ने राजा रतन सेन के भरोसेमंद सामंतों से मदद ली और उन्हें दिल्ली से बचा लिया। इस बीच जब राजा रतन सेन दिल्ली से बचकर भाग रहे थे, तो कुंभलनेर के राजपूत राजा देवपाल ने रानी पद्मावती को शादी के लिए प्रस्ताव दिया। जब राजा रतन सेन वापस चित्तौड़ आए और उन्हें देवपाल की इस हरकत के बारे में पता चला, तो उन्होंने देवपाल के खिलाफ मोर्चा खोल दिया। दोनों के बीच हुए युद्ध में राजा देवपाल और रतन सेन दोनों ने एक-दूसरे की हत्या कर दी। रतन सेन की मौत के बाद अलाउद्दीन खिलजी ने एक बार फिर चित्तौड़ पर हमला कर उसे जीतने की कोशिश की। मगर, रानी ने इस बार जौहर व्रत (आग में कूद जाना) ले लिया। उनके साथ राजमहल की हजारों वीरांगनाओं ने अपनी जान दे दी। खिलजी के हाथ में राख के अलावा कुछ नहीं आया।
Ramendra Chakarwarti
करणी सेना को ऐतराज

करणी सेना का इस बात पर ऐतराज था कि फिल्म पद्मावती में जिस अंदाज में उनको पर्दे पर उतारा गया है, वो सही नहीं है। अलाउद्दीन खलजी और पद्मावती के बीच प्रेम संबंध नहीं था, लेकिन दोनों के बीच प्रेम कहानी को फिल्मी पर्दे पर उतारा गया है। करणी सेना के आरोपों पर फिल्म से जुड़े लोगों की दलील थी कि उनका मकसद किसी समाज को अपमानित करना नहीं है। फिल्म में एक भी हिस्सा ऐसा नहीं, जिस पर राजपूत समाज के मान अभिमान को कमतर किया गया है।

फिल्म पद्मावती की रिलीज पर अखिल भारतीय क्षत्रिय महासभा के राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष कुंवर अजय सिंह ने Jagran.Com से खास बातचीत में कहा कि उनका संगठन पूरे देश में फिल्म की रिलीज का विरोध करेगा। करणी सेना,राजपूत सभा जयपुर और भंसाली के बीच हुए समझौते को नहीं मानते हैं। उन्होंने कहा कि भारत का क्षत्रिय समाज रानी पद्मावती को अपनी मां की तरह मानता है, लिहाजा किसी भी शख्स को इस बात की इजाजत नहीं दी जा सकती है वो उनका अपमान करे। अपनी बात को आगे बढ़ाते हुए उन्होंने कहा कि बिकाऊ इतिहासकारों ने देश के मान को कभी नहीं रखा। अखिल भारतीय क्षत्रिय महासभा का स्पष्ट मत है कि ऐसे किसी भी शख्स को अपने विचारों को व्यक्त करने की आजादी नहीं दी जा सकती है जिसे देशप्रेम से कोई वास्ता नहीं हो।
Ramendra Chakarwarti
इतिहासकार के नजरिए से

जवाहर लाल नेहरू विश्वविद्यालय के मध्यकालीन इतिहास के प्रोफेसर नजफ हैदर कहते हैं कि उनका शोध 14वीं और 16वीं शताब्दी पर है, इसलिए वो भरोसे के साथ कह सकते हैं कि पद्मावती एक काल्पनिक किरदार हैं। यहां तक कि अलाउद्दीन खिलजी चित्तौड़ पर हमले की बात तो करता है, लेकिन पद्मावती का कोई जिक्र नहीं है। उस समय की कोई भी किताब उठा लें, उसमें कहीं भी जिक्र नहीं मिलता है। पद्मावती के लोकप्रिय होने की वजह यह है कि स्थानीय राजपूत पंरपरा के तहत चारणों ने इस किरदार का खूब बखान किया। इस वजह से भी यह कथा काफी लोकप्रिय हुई। यह सच है कि 16वीं शताब्दी में हिन्दी साहित्य पद्मावत में मलिक मुहम्मद जायसी ने इस किरदार को जिंदा किया। हिन्दी साहित्य में पद्मावती की जगह है और साहित्य भी इतिहास का एक हिस्सा होता है। हिन्दी साहित्य को पढ़ाने के लिए पद्मावती का विशेष रूप से इस्तेमाल करना चाहिए, लेकिन इतिहास की किताब में पद्मावती की कोई जगह नहीं है। यदि इतिहास की किताब में पद्मावती है तो यह भ्रमित करने वाला है।
Ramendra Chakarwarti
आम दर्शकों की राय

Jagran.Com ने इस विषय पर अलग-अलग उम्र समूह के फिल्म दर्शकों से बातचीत की। मौजूदा पीढ़ी के ज्यादातर लोगों का मानना है कि वो महज मनोरंजन की दृष्टि से फिल्म देखने जाते हैं। उनके लिए किसी फिल्म की ऐतिहासिकता से खास लेना-देना नहीं है। 1 दिसंबर को रिलीज होने जा रही रानी पद्मावती फिल्म को लेकर वो काफी उत्सुक है, दरअसल वो संजय लीला भंसाली के निर्देशन क्षमता के मुरीद हैं। पिछली फिल्मों 'बाजीराव मस्तानी' और 'देवदास' में उन्होंने अपनी सोच को उच्चतम स्तर पर परदे पर उतारा था।
Ramendra Chakarwarti
विरोध के बीच रुपहले पर्दे पर रानी पद्मावती फिल्म एक दिसंबर को देशभर में रिलीज होने को तैयार है।
Sumudu Perera
,kuch bi ho padmavathi ka roll keliye deepika pdukone suite nahi karthe.wo ith na kupsoorath nahi he.or yemovie me ranveer sing ko game of the throne ke kaleesi ka husbund ka coppy diya he.oh my god.evrythink is coppy only.
Bollygrad Studioz
http://www.dailyo.in/arts/delhi-sultanate-alauddin-khilji-padmavati-deepika-padukone/story/1/20028.html
Bollywood's Padmavati is history's nightmare. Delhi Sultan Alauddin Khilji was no barbarian
Sanjay Leela Bhansali must put better researchers on the job next time!
Period dramas have a special place in the world of cinema. The gargantuan scale on which these movies are mounted definitely leaves a lasting impact on the audience. Not only that, exorbitant amounts are spent on creating lavish sets and opulent royal quarters. With so much at stake, these period dramas - often incorrectly called "historical" films - are considered one of the most sought-after genres of popular Hindi cinema. Be it Salim and Anarkali from K Asif's Mughal-E-Azam or Jodha and Akbar from Ashutosh Gowariker's magnum opus Jodha Akbar, the Indian audience has always appreciated the portrayal of historical figures on the celluloid.

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's ambitious project Padmavati is a much-awaited period drama, set to release in December. The filmmaker did not have to strategise much in terms of publicity as enough was gained from the furore during its shooting in Rajasthan. The Karni Sena made sure that the film made headlines, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Nothing could probably come in the way of a determined Bhansali who was eager to make a film on the legendary Rani Padmini of Chittor, her spouse and the then king of Chittor, Maharawal Ratan Singh, and the zealous Sultan of Delhi, Alauddin KhiljiThe social media has been abuzz right from the day the movie was announced, and over the past month-and-a-half, people have been glued to the Twitter handles of the leading cast of the movie for latest updates, particularly of Deepika Padukone, who has been very successful in enthralling her followers on Twitter with "first look" poster shots - and finally the official trailer.

The trailer looks promising in the beginning, with the gorgeous Deepika Padukone making an entry in all her glory as a queen, followed by her brave Rajput king, perfectly characterised by Shahid Kapur. The background score seems to be good, the cinematography seems to be excellent, but wait, all this magnificence and beauty goes down the drain the moment Alauddin Khilji appears on the scene.

While many have drawn parallels with of Khilji's on-screen depiction with that of Khal Drogo from Game of Thrones but the point is not whether the "look" is a rip-off or not, the point is that it is an incorrect depiction of the character. A closer look at history might have clinched the matter but Bhansali didn't probably have the time to focus on details, and that is what determines the fine line between good/average and brilliant cinema .A study of medieval Indian history reveals that the Sultans of Delhi were highly "persianised" as far as the court culture was concerned. An example is that of Sultan Balban, who - for the first time - introduced the "Theory of Kingship" based on the Persian theory which believed that the "King is the Shadow of God on Earth".

In fact, Balban was the first to use the title of Zille Ilahi (God's shadow on Earth). He is also supposed to have introduced the sijda (prostration) and paibos (kissing the feet of the ruler) as ceremonial rituals in his court.

These Sultans of Delhi were definitely men of violent demeanour who followed an aggressive expansionist policy and were also zealots when it came to raising the banner of Islam; however, since they were deeply influenced by Persian culture, it becomes highly improbable to believe that they were barbaric. The depiction of Alauddin Khilji in Padmavati is grossly incorrect and reflects poor research on the part of the filmmaker.

The biggest give-away is the scene showing Khilji gobbling up meat like a Neanderthal. An objective analysis of historical details points to the fact that the Sultans of Delhi displayed civilised mannerisms, and were not given into barbaric practices as shown in the teaser.

Alauddin Khilji might have been a villain, he probably was because he conquered so many territories, and ruthlessly killed so many people, but he surely wasn't barbaric. Bhansali could have found better ways to make a villain look more menacingYes, there is a definite problem as far as the reference point is concerned as there are no pictorial representations found in Persian sources, and there are no paintings of the Sultanate period as well but some common sense judgements would have made the character of Alauddin Khilji look more believable. For one, Bhansali could have done away with the long locks as it is not permissible in Islam for men to sport long hair, and Alauddin Khilji being a devout Muslim would not have dared to anger the ulema of his court. Second, the residence of Khilji is shown to be a dark dungeon, however, on the contrary the palace quarters of Sultans used to be aesthetically decorated sometimes even with precious and semi-precious stonesIt was Alauddin Khilji who got the third city of Delhi, Siri, built during his lifetime, and if he were such a barbarian, would he have had the sense of having an entire city constructed? Third, the woolen cape/overcoat or whatever it may look like might not have been the preferred way of beating the cold in the late 13th and early 14th centuries.

The Sultans who had a higher taste in terms of clothes preferred silk and velvet robes over the Atilla the Hun kind of dress sense, since the former had all the wherewithal to purchase expensive cloth material from Indian and foreign markets, unlike the latter who was a barbaric conqueror with a limited worldview.

Period dramas in the past have been criticised for being ahistorical and factually incorrect, and some have also been shunned totally by the audiences on account of being ridiculously slow and boring, but Khilji's on-screen depiction in Padmavati is going to take the cake as far as faulty cinematic representation is concerned.

The film will release as per schedule, it might also become a blockbuster, but what will not go down well with historians is the projection of Alauddin Khilji as a barbarian. Yes, he was a merciless conqueror, a hard-hearted and cold-blooded expansionist - even a fanatic to some extent because of the puritanical measures introduced by him - but not a barbarian. Bhansali, kindly put better researchers on the job next time!
Bollygrad Studioz
That Ranveer Singh is at the top of his game is a given, but the fact that Sanjay Leela Bhansali's two directorials, 'Ram-Leela' and 'Bajirao Mastani' helped Ranveer in cementing his superstar status in Bollywood cannot be denied. Hence, it comes as an unpleasant surprise that the actor, who considers Bhansali as his mentor, is now at loggerheads with him regarding their next collaboration, 'Padmavati'. Reportedly, the actor has put forth a very strong condition and has asked Bhansali to cut down co-star Shahid Kapoor's role and bill him as special / guest appearance, which the director has outright refused to do so, saying it would be unfair to Shahid. The reports further suggest that Bhansali had his own valid reasons for not agreeing to Ranveer's demands; firstly, the director has booked equal number of dates of both Ranveer and Shahid and secondly, Shahid agreed to come on board only after being assured that his role will be as meaty as Ranveer's in the film. Hence, Bhansali argues that if he bills Shahid's role as special / guest appearance then he will leave the film, which is the last thing Bhansali wants to happen at this stage of the film which was supposed to go on floors few days ago. The director has now asked Ranveer's ladylove Deepika to step in and bail him out of the crisis by convincing Ranveer to start shooting. Reports even suggest that Bhansali has decided to not work with Ranveer ever in the future after 'Padmavati'. Sigh!https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/most-talked-about-biopics-you-just-cannot-miss/Ranveer-asks-Bhansali-to-cut-down-Shahids-role-in-Padmavati-to-a-special-appearance/photostory/54405252.cms
Riya Roy
👉Deepika just OSAM.👈👌
Tanu Pradhan Tanu Pradhan
Nice voice Ankit
Ramendra Chakarwarti
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmavati_(film)
Ramendra Chakarwarti
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_Padmini
Ramendra Chakarwarti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_5_BLt76c0
Kamar Alam
The Authentic True History Of Padmavati: Written on Date 1210, 1220 and 1300 AD.
It clearly states that Padmavati was a simple woman like many other women’s and wife of Raja Ratan Sen of Rajput. The Historian’s written in those day of Rajput, Brshman’s and Muslim's doesn’t describe about her extraordinary beautifulness neither her superiority beauty.
There was problem territory between Chittor King Raja Ratan Sen (husband of Padmavati) and neighbour Kumbalner regior King Raja Devpal. The Problem led to combat between these two nearby Territories of Chiior and Kumbalner due to which Chittor regime Raja Ratan Sen was defeated and killed along with his many soldiers by Kumbalner Raja Devpal with his Army. so Chittor was occupied under Devpal magistrate.
In Rajputs its very old sacred practice of Sati of woman on terms of her husband have been dead or killed.
Therefore, Rajput Sacred Sati was practiced on all the women’s whose Husband were Killed in that combat due to which Rani Padmavati (wife of Raja Ratan Sen) along with other women’s were welcomed to holy Sati event and burnt to death by the rituals followers.
After few months, Alaudin Khalji needed to expand his territory to Rajasthan, Gujarat and some places of Present Maharashtra.
The Historian of 1297 states: Alaudin Khalji not only concurred/occupied Chittor but also Ranthambore, Chanderi, Dhar, Ujjain and Mewar in that same month of time and it wasn’t due to Padmavati. Confirmed.
Alaudin Khalji Territorial expansion was friendlier, where he used to give a friendlier hand written letter to all the expansion regions kings to come under the regime of Mughal Sultane and enjoy their unity and correlation under one Kingdome. Some offered hands in hands happily, while some Fighted with him, of one such combat was Kumbalner & Chittor Raja Devpal and Alaudin.
But in 1900 the store of Alaudin was faked and written as present Padmavati to degrade the Mughal King by Sanghi.
In 1900, then Hindu sanghi historian faked and written a new story of Beautiful Rani Pandmavati and affairs Mughal King Alaudin ….. Hahaa,
This was famous epics that time, the Fake Rani Padmavati was popularize in journals and Story Books. Then in 1980, the rise of sanghi: made Rani Padmavati serials and movie too ,… the same mith followed now by sanghi make another movie of Padmavati to degrade Mughals.
Jawaharlal Nehru in 1940s : Said Rani Padmavati is a local poem made now a day and it fakes the actual Truth.
PLEASE GUYS READ THE HISTORY OF 1200 AND 1300, NOT THE SANGHI’S MADE HISTORY OF AND FROM 1900.
arjun arya
I like the facts really very intreasting specially the story . . . And ankit for you thoda diction pr dhyan do kuki (sh) or (s) me bhuat clear nhi h bs . . .thoda diction pr or mhent kro .
Lucky Thakur
Ranveer... Look At waoooo... Waiting for the movie... Nice facts
Rush Stark
Padmavati Official Trailer 1st December Ranveer Singh Shahid Kapoor Deepika Padukone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxTZS0oDN0M&feature=youtu.be
VIRAL IN INDIA
watch padmavati movie new trailer
https://youtu.be/aqm7LJfy-j0
g- one
Good👍🏻
TOP 5z
PADMAVATI MOVIE STAR CAST SALARY ...SHOCKING ... https://youtu.be/sVH-4V4vCPo
Tina D
Dull Deepika, does not have spark in her eyes, Parineeti Chopra could have done better.... her face is very expressive
Aninda Biswas
Abe kon chutiya bol raha...na English bol Raha Thik se na hindi
Desi Girls
this movie will be super hit
Desi Girls
superB trailer
Varsha Singh
Padmavati: Shahid Kapoor’s Maharawal Ratan Singh avatar is the audience favourite, says pollIf there is one film that movie buffs are waiting with bated breath, it is Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmavati. This period drama has piqued the interest of fans months before its release, so much so that the looks of Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh, and Shahid Kapoor alone have sent audiences into a frenzy overnight.
And now, an Indian Express Twitter poll suggests that Shahid Kapoor’s bloody and scarred avatar as Maharawal Ratan Singh is the one that has been able to woo fans more than Deepika and Ranveer. Well, there is no doubt that the gory, sword-bearing and battle-field ready Shahid in Padmavati posters is one to set a million hearts racing. But that doesn’t mean that Ranveer and Deepika are any less. After all, Shahid won by a mere 2 percent from Ranveer who was at 33 percent and Deepika at just 32 percent.
While Deepika has donned a regal avatar quite a few times previously, there is something special about Rani Padmini. Every minute detail has been taken care of, from her unibrow to her deep-set eyes and her profound expression.
Varsha Singh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZaOxu1Hpbo
Varsha Singh
ankit ....is film mein aur Interesting facts hain jinko aapne nazarandaz kar diya hain ...aapko aur mehnat karna chahiye tha...
yek ek achcha pryas hain ...lekin aap aur mehnat karo ...aapki aawaz bahut achchi hain ..
mujhe to is film ka intzar hain ..
Rishabh upadhyay
Nice
Ramendra Chakarwarti
Alauddin Khilji harassed a woman. Romanticising his story is an insult to women
Jayasi's work perceived as 'romantic poetry' says volumes about the perception of both 'love' and women in his eyes.
Related Videos